>>10854709Traditionalism may change from place to place, but probably every pre 1900 society held these traditional values
>religion>worked for the state>maybe starting a familyObviously in Europe, most mathematicians were Christian, and worked in state-run universities, help positions in the military, maybe started business and families, and worked on engineering projects for the city. Some even married into nobility. In other societies such as the aztecs, the mathematicians were also priests, and everyone served in the military. You will not find a single society that had mathematicians where these were not the traditional views. You claim in
>>10854037>>10851023>Almost all of mathematics was discovered by people more liberal than their peers>conservatives are uneducated when it comes to the sciencesso I will list a number of mathematicians who were traditionals/conservatives, not liberals, whose mathematical contributions would be considered "almost all of mathematics"
>all ancient greek mathematicians, since as you say, we can't call them liberals just because they were boy fuckers. but they were certainly religious and worked for the state>fermat>euler>gauss>cantor>newton>laplace>bernoulli>cauchy>godel>ussr mathematicians>wolframNow name all the bitchass liberals you want. The whole of their mathematical contributions doesn't even come close to the names I just listed. If conservative universities in America started banning free speech like liberals, and even went as far as to burn all the liberal mathematicians' contributions, math majors wouldn't be any different. On the other hand, the contributions of liberal mathematicians is barely felt, even in modern math. Face it, all you idiots are good for is crying and coming up with bullshit philosophy.
