>>10847415>And as far as I'm concerned the argument for simulation is rather elegant.It's the worst possible argument. It just shifts all questions one layer up. If this Universe is a simulation on another Universe, which process created that one? All questions here will be applied there. And you can't say that its "simulations all the way up" same as you cant say its turtles all the way down.
Simulation theory is an exact copy of Creationism but also throws out the window anything relating to aseity, contingency and causality. Simulation always relies on an infinite string of entities or it is simply a convoluted subtype of Creationism.
