>>10847082>so bio tech has more potential use cases/growth than your stranded CS researchI'm not in quantum, but CS research across the board is not "stranded." Even the most theoretical work is well funded and well motivated into interesting application.
Bioinformatics is pretty interesting, but lately most DNA applications have come down to
>hehe can we apply dynamic programming or notFour Russians and bounding space complexity for table lookup was big for DNA.
I do agree that biotech is exciting, but it's far from "the potential of the field." That's your bio bias showing
>>10847145Do what interests you anon. If you chase the paycheck, you'll get smoked easily by people who are actually passionate since CS is a ridiculously competitive field.
It's not about saturation. It's about whether you actually like studying it, because that's where novel research comes from.
