>>10844853It's not brain what makes human "that" human. It's mostly how neurons are connected which makes human human, therefore woman and man can have different tendencies to commit wrongness. ( And nobody usually care if you do right ). Different looks at wrongness. But it's hard to deduce who is having optimal motivation or action.
You can't say that one is better than other. Some woman are better at Maths than most men.
Their brain as it was shaped trough "mind's evolution(information it has processed)" is different due to different social roles, and man won't be ever birth giving and breastfeeding(please don't take this as challenge) also providing is different even on the basis how it works on genetic markers, therefore it's for sure different.
It doesn't mean man is suited for role just because it's man, yes statistically it works(maybe because there is better probability to man will behave optimal way in that situation), but books warned you about using statics in that way, and judging individual with statistics is ( Hitler did that ) forbidden since second world war.
Everybody who does so is using probably overfitting deductive logic which generally fails at predicting case and is working on "enforcing prediction" more than predicting correctly, just to see order.
It's disadvantage to not have deductive logic, but most of them are simple failure in the base predicates of itself.
Also don't use ass(It's a privilege.) if:
Man's
Not your's
Woman are not property also. ( I'm not saying that they are )
