/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #10843845

564KiB, 1080x2280, Screenshot_20190728-114027_Snapchat.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 28 Jul 16:47:25 2019 No.10843845 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>10844016 >>10844228 >>10844257 >>10845505

>They think malaria is caused by a virus
>They clearly have no understanding of biology, microbiology, invertibrate zoology, or virology
>Fake news btfo

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Jul 2019 18:06:22 No.10844016 Report

Quoted By:

>>10843845
The difference between malaria parasites and viruses is clear as day. Vice had too much to drink.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Jul 2019 19:10:19 No.10844228 Report

Quoted By: >>10844238

>>10843845
>gets excited when he sees a blatant mistake on a popsci article
>he doesnt realize literally every popsci article has blatant mistakes
just wait until you find one in a real paper, it's hilarious

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Jul 2019 19:12:32 No.10844238 Report

Quoted By: >>10844244 >>10844249

>>10844228
>real paper
implying they aren't just more professionally written pop sci articles

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Jul 2019 19:13:29 No.10844244 Report

Quoted By: >>10844262

>>10844238
you have no idea what you're talking about lel.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Jul 2019 19:14:01 No.10844246 Report

Quoted By:

Normies should be banned from STEM

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Jul 2019 19:15:03 No.10844249 Report

Quoted By: >>10844285

>>10844238
Real papers don't confuse viruses with protozoa. It's not even in the same scale regarding size. It's like confusing an ant with an elephant.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Jul 2019 19:16:51 No.10844257 Report

Quoted By:

>>10843845
Gotta love journalism
Its unironically the most retarded thing you can graduate in

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Jul 2019 19:17:37 No.10844262 Report

Quoted By:

>>10844244
>lel
obviously it is you who is right
published papers carry more realness due to peer review

>did i toe the line correctly?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Jul 2019 19:21:44 No.10844285 Report

Quoted By: >>10844675

>>10844249
There are massive mistakes like that in published papers. It sometimes makes it through the review process, mistakes happen. Dunno why you're making a thread about some journalist making a stupid mistake.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Jul 2019 21:53:02 No.10844675 Report

Quoted By:

>>10844285
>mistakes like that in published papers
Naah, not like that.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO anti-journalism.jpg, 53KiB, 1082x474

Anonymous Sun 28 Jul 2019 22:19:30 No.10844734 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO anti-journalism2.png, 8KiB, 734x100

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches