All evidence against the Apollo landings seems to have already been debunked, but is there any "smoking gun" evidence for the landings? Codes identify youtube videos after ?v=
There's this video, which shows a perfect match between LEM descent footage and more recent imaging of the moon, but supposedly lots of imagery was taken of the moon prior to Apollo 11 anyway: TsM2aNwcUqE
Then there's this video, showing that footage is consistent with the lower g on the moon, but even this isn't a "smoking gun": NxZMjpMhwNE
So, /sci/, do you know of any completely watertight smoking guns for Apollo? The landings almost certainly took place, just it would be nice to have irrefutable proof rather than relying on debunking hoaxers.
There's this video, which shows a perfect match between LEM descent footage and more recent imaging of the moon, but supposedly lots of imagery was taken of the moon prior to Apollo 11 anyway: TsM2aNwcUqE
Then there's this video, showing that footage is consistent with the lower g on the moon, but even this isn't a "smoking gun": NxZMjpMhwNE
So, /sci/, do you know of any completely watertight smoking guns for Apollo? The landings almost certainly took place, just it would be nice to have irrefutable proof rather than relying on debunking hoaxers.
