>>10831878i'm no hawking fan, but i'm not going to post my standard hawking hate stuff, because lately it's come to my attention that there are schizos who post here who claim something i am loathe to repeat but it goes something like
>hawking was not one person, he was replaced by several look-alikes by jews because hurr durr conspiracy zog, and also hurr durr science bad because it's an affront to god, hurr durr muh jesus needs to smackdown science and hurr durr his enemy is scientists like hawking who was actually multiple vegeteables with his speech software controlled by the (((jews)))i mean, given that there is a level of hawking hate that goes to _that_ level, i don't even feel right posting my scientific objections to him. it just feeds schizo stuff.
