>>14382712>You're criticizing some strawman in your head. "Nuance" is a word that makes you hard, but all of your "nuance" consists of mental gymnastics and masturbation. You are the same as all the other clinical midwits who talk like you. There's something really delicious about this "conversation". I don't understand what you mean.
>You accuse me of reducing you into a stereotype, meanwhile you conform closer and closer to that stereotype with every post, regurgitating stereotypical talking points with a stereotypical delivery, and even trying to do to me what you accuse me of doing to you, so we even have that prototypical hypocrisy nailed downWell, I'm telling you what I think and you tell me I'm acting in a certain way, than I told you again what I think (that I don't care about politics), and than I told you again what I think (that I think you have a rigid dual view of things). If I am a stereotype than so be it, I have no problem with that, I'm just saying what I think and making conversation.
>The stereotype is a 100% accurate portrait of everything you ever were, are, and could ever be. :^)Although I do believe that the environment and past experience shape people, I also think information and awareness can dramatically change the course of a persons life, so I would disagree with "and could ever become.".
