>>14373056No. A lot of classical art is certainly very bland, I don't even have that much against modernism, but it was the stepping stone from where art rapidly declined into nothingness. Where classical art varies between displaying true greatness of humanity throughout the ages and mediocre blandness, modernism alternates between grandiose expressions of the human experience in the face of unprecedented change and revolting degeneracy or utter nonsense.
I don't even dislike Mondrian, but it is very clearly that "his one painting" works exactly once. Slapping some random (semi) geometrical paints on your canvas or slapping on it randomly, like so many modernist artists did, only works so many times, the joke got old very quickly. Most of it is a farce, which was the result of art being utterly destroyed as a "bespoke" representation with a real function.
I went to an art exhibition by the disabled some time ago and they managed to fill their art with the human character which modern (and especially post modern) art so often lacks.
