>>14357944>what you're saying is there are some immortalsyes, absolutely
>how old are they?some of them are thousands of years old at least, but the juvenizing mutualistic and symbiotic nature of these reproductive organs has been around for tens of millions of years at least, so who knows how old the oldest are
>those still unnamed partslet me get this straight, you are so invested in your own willful ignorance that you refused to employ a search engine as instructed above?
>parts of the seedswhat I'm describing are reproductive structures encasing the seeds, they are not part of the seeds, the seeds are part of these structures
again, "angiosperm" is derived from "angios", meaning "vessel", precisely because the seeds are encased in these structures, whereas in gymnosperms, which, again, is from "gymnos", meaning "naked", the seeds are not encased, but rather attached to the outside
>only in freshand even more important, fully mature
in fact, maturity is far more important than freshness
such a structure that is not fully mature will be extremely toxic for all the reasons I explained in great detail in the previous reply, whereas such a structure that was mature when detached but is not fully fresh will at least be edible and exert some beneficial effects, but it will not even remotely be able to keep you physically immortal
>how often do they eat?they are no different from us biologically, except for the fact that their metabolism functions in a constantly optimal manner, which means energy in the form of calories are utilized much more efficiently
in other words, while they eat less, they still eat practically every single day like you, perhaps skipping a day once in a blue moon
>How many plants are you supposed to deprive of that valuable stuff a day?deprive?
these reproductive structures are made by the plants with the specific purpose of them being eaten, the purpose being to attract mobile animals like primates, birds and bats to disperse their seeds
