>>14309201It's disturbing that there's a human-looking meatsack behind these bot posts. Anyway, it's obvious that I'm right and you're wrong, and this is boring. I wasn't even arguing anything specifically about 2D, contrary to your psychotic delusions, but you know what? Any model you come up with can be translated into a computational form, so it can be reproduced in Conway's Game of Life, and I could arrive at any prediction you can make by following nothing but Conway's 3 simple rules on a 2D grid. Maybe that's what reality is, on a fundamental level: a big cellular automaton, entirely 2D. You would never know the difference. You'd be stuck thinking in terms of your abstract, illustionary 3D space, ignorant of God's divine 2D wisdom. We could discuss the reasons underlying this possibility, and some of their more interesting implications, but let's face it: you lack the basic spark of humanity to even comprehend what I just said. You are like an animal.
