>>14288918>Wich definition are you using?https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/macroevolution/>>Macroevolution in the modern sense is evolution that is guided by selection among interspecific variation, as opposed to selection among intraspecific variation in microevolution. This modern definition differs from the original concept, which referred macroevolution to the evolution of taxa above the species level This has nothing to do with microevolution after N number of generations getting "very large" (whatever that means). The so called "selection on interspecific variation" can happen in a single generation. A drought would instantly cause "selection on interspecific variation" that would quickly kill off members of a species if that species required larger volumes of water, or amphibious species. Certainly it could also take a handful of generations to kill off a significant number of the population too, but absolutely nothing approaching a "very large" number of generations is needed to fulfill this "definition" of macroevolution.
This bullshit wiki definition isn't even a type of evolution in the first place since "selection on interspecific variation" invariably applies uniformly to the species thus no change in proportion/diversity of alleles in a population would be needed which is the fundamental definition of evolution (ie a drought would uniformly kill all members of a species far far more so than it eliminates certain genes within a species that are better suited for a drought if those genes even existed for a specific species, like bigger finch beaks, which is micro evolution).
A same event would thus instantly and paradoxically cause macro and micro evolution according to this "definition".... it's obviously just more sophistry/twisting of definitions from evolutionists trying to pretend macroevolution can occur right before our very eyes. GASP! IT MUST BE TRUE BC THE PROPAGANDA WAS INTENTIONALLY CHANGED TO MAKE IT TRUE SORTA! (sarcasm)
