>>14251203>Are you sure? Funding inequality is an ongoing problem something that has happened for generations. IQ scoring came after that and I have not seen many credible sources that provide evidence that IQ is not capturing the results of black people being denied quality education for hundreds of years. I don't understand what you are trying to say.
>Why do they not belong?I am not saying that blacks do not belong, I am saying that students who aren't sufficiently capable to enter academia based on academic performance are the ones who do not belong.
>As someone involved in hiring grad students the very few non whites who apply are well qualified. Again, it seems to me that you have prejudices You are failing to understand the point I am making. The blacks who are applying for graduate school are largely self-selected, they are NOT representative of the average black citizen. The existence of capable black academics does not refute the fact that blacks on average are less capable academically (per IQ constraints) and this explains the decreased representation of blacks in undergrad, graduate school, and IQ-loaded careers. Capable blacks should have equal opportunity as all other races in getting admissions and funding, they just shouldn't be given additional privileges on the basis of being amongst the minority of high IQ blacks.
>As I've said there's no barriers at this level, and I've discussed where the barriers are, decades before anyone applies to gradschool.Sure, and those should be corrected. Supplementing black communities with increasing financial support will not correct their biological deficiencies (in as so far as low IQ is a biological deficiency.
None of my sentiments have been racist, but it is certainly much easier to label me as such rather than refuting my points.
