>>14221556>wikipedia is unreliable as factcheck in politics related subjectsI checked the sources provided by Wikipedia, and not one were primary sources:
>Malone received criticism for propagating COVID-19 misinformation, including making claims about the toxicity of spike proteins generated by some COVID-19 vaccines;[4][19][6][31]4: this is a fact checking page, not a primary source, refers to others without providing links you can check.
19: this is on Politifact, hardly a paragon of scientific integrity. Instead we get "Experts say" without naming those alleged experts.
6: this is from Reuters. The pattern of non-scientific "sources" is becoming clear. They take it one step further and reference Reuters Fact Check.
31: this is a Chinese fact check lab. Weak stuff finished by pleading for funding.
This is classic Wikipedia fraud: selecting dodgy "sources" when it suits them.
G-A-R-B-A-G-E
