>>14147417She didn't which makes me feel bad for her, basically someone posted a picture of her to reddit, to which they simped for her like twitch does with twitch-thots, made the entire spiel about how she did most the work, she's a hero for modern female scientists, etc etc. People ended up pointing out she only committed like 5-10% of the code and stuff, but the mods were also simping so they banned the naysayers.
The entire issue was blown up and perpetuated by reddit being simps. All because she took a photo of some work she did she was proud of, and I don't think she directly said she did anything other than management so it's not like she caused the issue.
On one hand I feel bad for her because she was made out to be a fraud for claims she didn't say for a situation she didn't make (reddit are autistic dogs when it comes to average and above women), but also she got a ton of benefits from it so I don't feel too bad.
Shit taught me it's not if you're objectively right or not, it's about if people want to believe you (as per the naysayers who literally quoted their github statistics and got banned for it)
