>>14121880>Too much mutation is bad, too little mutation is badProve it retard. Your cope is that "evolution" is fine tuning itself because it knows how much mutation it will need in the future. Total bullshit. You probably dont' know what "punctuated equilibrium" means but it's the cope evolutionist idea that sometimes things very very rapidly evovle and leave no fossil record behind (it's just a cope because missing links don't exist, but it's still mainstream theory). So you are wrong. Clearly your belief system sometimes shows that rapid "too much" mutation was beneficial in nature from your point of view.
>>14121880>>Mutations are less frequent in very important genes.>No shit that biological organisms would develop, through evolution, mechanisms to prevent mutations to their most important genesPure surevivorship bias. The plants with mutated important genes died. This is so obvious if you weren't blinded by your dogma.
>Your body has infinitely many failsafes to overrun mistakes and mutations in its processesyeah, wonderful designs
>This points to evolutionNot at all. Failsafes don't serve purpose unless something fails. If something fails and there's no failsafe, you have a dead organism. Dead organisms can't evolve hence the failsafe can't evolve either. You are welcome to show a half evolved fail safe actually provides benefit. They dont'.
>Intelligent design is one of the most retarded To unintelligent people like you. It's by far the most logical explanation.
>It requires you constantly sabotaging yourself by constantly cherry picking and ignoring all the evidence of defects and horrible things that exist in nature, both for humans and animals.There is no evidence of defects in nature. That is all atheist retard cope. And yes, I'm aware of all of them. The recurrent layrgneal nerve is a great one. It is actually more suggestive that it can't evolve in it's configuration rather than suggest it should not have been designed that way.
