>>13753880That's what I get for morningposting. Now that I'm more awake, I will point out that you are not refuting my intended interpretation, which is that *most* scientists refuse to acknowledge natural immunity.
>SEE YOUR MOVING THE GOALPOSTSIt's not moving the goalposts, it's elaboration on the original intention of the sentence for someone who is too autistic or ESL to have understood. Consider the following imagined argument
>Person A: Scientists say the vaccines are safe and effective>Person B: No, watch this Bitchute video of Robert Malone. Since there is a scientist who says the vaccines are not safe, you are wrongDo you genuinely believe Person B made a good point there?
If you do, then I actually will move goalposts (is it so wrong to make a moderate concession without conceding the entire point?) and say that I do not have faith in scientists like Anthony Fauci who refuse to acknowledge superior natural immmunity.
>So is your issue with scientists or Western media? Both, retard
