>>13705292>if you care about freedoms being curtailedI don't. I reject your concept of "freedom"; it's an imaginary superstition that you define and redefine ad hoc to suit your dumb nigger monkey whims.
>Can any freedoms of any individual be ignored, if it leads to more people being 'better off'or is their some guiding principle?
What you're allowed to do can, is, and will be constrained in the interest of social stability, and in accordance with the moral sensibilities of the people around you.
