>>13706530You fucking brainlet retard
All this thread you've been admitting yourself, AS YOUR SOURCES DO, that the evolution of life as we theorize it is not impossible, just very unlikely
You don't get to roll a d100, get a 67 and go
>NOOOOOO HOW COULD I GET A 67 DON'T YOU KNOW IT'S ONLY A 1 IN 100 LIKELIHOODEspecially you don't get to argue the process after the result it's witnessed
It's not a "paradox", it would be one if an RNA first world was undeniably mathematically impossible
But we can clearly see that something happened to make us
When I'm asking you how else it coukd have happened, I'm not asking you to replace my theory with a better one, I'm not putting any onus of proof on you
I'm just asking you: how? How can you say "we" never went through an abiogenesis process when "we" in the origin were nothing more than clouds of hydrogen and helium?
Spoiler alert: I already know the answer that would defend your "theory" and BTFO me, and it's very simple (no it's not God), but I want to see if you can make any logical argument instead of calling us dumb and posting soijacks
