>>13517626>the logic of contradictions and classic arguments are too strong?here is how all arguments for god are formulated, literally every single one
1. assume certain propositions that would necessitate the existence of a god
2. therefore god
the problem is in all of these arguments, the axioms are very questionable. why do you assume causality for everything but not god? why do you assume me thinking about something means it exists? etc
the probabilistic arguments are even worse, they commit fallacies even undergrads know are wrong. some of those are assuming independence, assuming all states are equally probable, models that lead to the conclusion that nothing is real and everything is impossible, not accounting to the fact that we only observed one iteration (like flipping a coin once), etc
