>>13398743anyone can comprehend an image, that's why they used one, to show to idiots like you who would suck it up like the gullible simpletons you are.
if you would look closer you would realize:
1. the image is inherently meaninglessly vague
2. it is created by 50GB of code which transforms noise into a similar "image"
the point of pictures is to give people with no critical thinking abilities something to latch on to
