>>13380262>intelligence isn’t about being able to put together some cubes or give some definitions or find and scribble shapes quickly.What is it about, then? What's the definition of intelligence that you're using that wouldn't end up being correlated to IQ?
>Someone with 145 is virtually the same as someone with 100,That isn't true. Did you even look through the (citations on the) wiki page or anything?
>>13380076>1) There are multiple scoring systems who assign different max values for IQ.There could be multiple scoring systems for anything that assign max values. How is that relevant?
>2) IQ corrects for children meaning a child of 12 who scores 30 IQ get boosted up, its something likeIQ = (18 - current age) * 3 + Your actual score
It used to be based off the "mental age" ratio but the common tests haven't done that for a long time and I haven't heard of this specifically
