>>13334854>I think there seldom has been a better midwit detector/uncoverer than the vaccine debate. It seriously is a watershed, we should keep a database of midwits by how unquestioning they are.This is somewhat true, but there's a difference between questioning and being paranoid
I'm highly educated. I feel slightly questionable about it. But all things considered, especially at societal level, we know the vaccine is at the very least less harmful than the virus, and for the vast majority of people it's a lot less harmful.
So even in the worst case (the worst case not being totally implausible), it's probably not a huge deal; and it possibly could end up as a net good. If some seriously convincing evidence starts coming out, could maybe just switch to focusing on giving it to vulnerable individuals
