>>3991883Pandering is for nothing if they're going to make the characters so obviously straight anyway.
So showing heavily implied het sex is perfectly okay but gay sex isn't huh? Just bait and instead heavily imply it's just friendship, "bromance"...
And I mean, there was Myozuru and Takauji but look at how he ended up treating it.
If these artists like homo as much as they do het, shouldn't they give both the same treatment?
And sure, I get the whole WSJ and general publisher restrictions, having to accommodate to the brainwashed homophobes (sane straight dudes wouldn't mind) and whatnot but come on, either do or do nothing at all.
If these artists truly wished to do full-on gay stuff just like they do het, they would have done so already at the very least as "unofficial" works of which the magazine publishers shouldn't have a say about but I didn't see any of that from Matsui.
So what's it to you? No balls or adhering to heteronormativity nonsense (or both)?
