>>3968145Let me explain it to you, since you seem a bit slow
The anon I was replying to, was complaining about people not posting images with their replies, because of that the thread reached bump limit before image limit.
So far ok?
On that very same post, that anon didn't post an image, so he's also making the same mistake he's complaining about. That makes him a hypocrite.
m'kay?
I pointed out his hypocrisy, while also not posting an image. But you see, I didn't complain about people not posting images, since I don't really care about that issue at all.
Conclussion
You can't call me hypocrite, or as you described:
>just as badSee the failure in your logic now?
