>>3761155>what other sorts of humor are there these days?Lots. That's not a filler answer, I really do mean to inform you that it's lots because you are very obviously unaware that there's lots.
I can tell you've only ever asked this question rhetorically because you're working entirely on a caricatured image of contemporary humor that has only a tangential basis in reality.
It's like if I were to argue that humor in the Bush and Obama years were shit entirely by citing Friedberg and Seltzer and Shane Dawson, effectively, the worst of 2000s humor is all 2000s humor. You, it's like you saw a single episode of Dear, White People and decided that was basically all contemporary humor, when it is very clearly not, are you living in an entirely different universe?
>offensive humor will always be superior to "humor" that bases itself around "punching up"A statement so nebulous it is effectively worthless.
The Romans had jokes about their senators' wives cucking their husbands with half the city like 2000 years ago -- that's punching up, and definitely funnier than your average first attempt at a cobbled together 9/11+hentai+wojak meme by 5th graders on the school computer.
Don't correct me, I know the kind of bullshit #feminism Buzzfeed humor you were thinking of, I'm just saying, you don't seem to mind it when your words clash with your meaning so badly that your sentences end up nonsense.
I know exactly the kind of shit that you are complaining about and by God is that stuff torture, even just the thumbnails for that Netflix Q-Force thing makes me wanna tear open my chest, but I can't agree with the assertion that everything's like that. Like ... it's not even an issue of "agree," as it's not even a matter of opinion, it's just a solid fact that not all comedy is like that, what the fuck else can I say?
>renaming token to "tolkien" Embarrassing.
I never liked South Park's brand of cowardly fence-sitting, but that takes the cake
