>>3327810Your definition of sfw is odd. The general rule is "could someone at an average job see this on your screen and not be offended". So if there is a clear erotic intent with genitals imprinting, excessive amounts of skin shown, sexual poses or whatever the image is not sfw. Alternatively a dick showing can be sfw if it is in the realm of classic art for example. Obviously these distinctions would require people to have any idea about the outside world which I guess is asked a little too much from the average /hm/ poster.
