>>2888628Ah yes, a site that you call a "scam for donations" and yet it took over 5 years to make certain it had built the securities to prevent getting hacked. And has been around again for quite a while without "being hacked" or "disappearing". Grow up. You dont have to like it, but then just avoid it. Stop trying to raise some Social Justice army.
>>2888710Site is fine for the most part. They have an "old" site built with better securities currently while they continue to work on the new site. Doesn't seem like they have too many people working on it, but mostly because of just not enough coders that can contribute hundreds of hours into the project, and hoping to avoid having a dev go rogue like the last time.
>>2888723The moderator isnt a pedo, but like anyone on /y/ can vouch - there are people who claim that someone under 18 years old are "shota" so you should check it out for your own views. Don't listen to the moron, but dont listen to me either - it is easier to just take a look. Including the filters now available too.
