>>2727377Because everyone was minding their own business until you came along insisting you know what the rules are.
The rules do not apply to people, they apply to content.
Anons are not content. You can call them "fugfags" all you want ; that's besides the point.
The point is that you read "furry" as an adjective instead of a noun. Which is understandable. Except, even as an adjective you're just fling it around like wet paint applying it to every tangential subject and association. It's not just "the character" but also "the image" and "the poster" and "the context".
And then when people correct you, what do you do? You try painting them as "furfags" too; thinking the rules will remove people who disagree with you.
You're the type of person who tries to abuse systems to enforce your personal justice. You're the neighbor that people have to sue for harassment because you don't like their lawn and kept calling the city to point out everything that isn't regulation. The type of person that get's charged with contempt of court, because it's clear you think the law in only useful for having your way. Even when something is not in your way, you'll go stand in front of it and make yourself an obstacle. You can never let things be.
Not only does this indicate a social disorder, but a disregard for your own well being, and lacking a fundamental understanding of relationships. You're the type of person who steps out into a street thinking, as a pedestrian with the right-of-way, that traffic laws will protect you and overcome physics and inertia to make truck stop on a dime.
You'll get hit. And then sent to a bureaucratic netherworld that'll compensate your "unfair" short life and lack of control by sending you on an Isekai Adventure w/ cheats to level up your interpersonal skills and emotional intelligence that were stunted in your last life.