>>2726095At a certain point one realizes beating a comatose patient over the head isn't going to elicit a response, so this will be my last post.
>you need to explain why "Nothing within the framing, color or composition suggests romantic or sexual attraction."Because it doesn't? You appeal to incredulity, and expect that to suffice as evidence, without providing any evidence from the image itself.
>Things have nothing to do with this.They are inherent to the communication of the medium, the equivalent of words on a page. Of course they matter.
>Why there are dozen of posters and half of them don't have anything to down with skating?This is my point, you can't even read what's in front of your eyes. There are 6 images, not a dozen, and only two are non-skating related (dog/sitting portrait).
>DoubtfulAll but confirmed, as not only are you incapable of counting, but you continue to reach for context OUTSIDE THIS ONE IMAGE ITSELF in order to justify your preferred interpretation.
>I actually realized Yuri was gay in the very first episodes,...Ah, but could you deduce it CONCLUSIVELY BASED ON THIS ONE IMAGE? No? No.
>while you probably were still trying to no homo himWe arrived at the same conclusion, I just have better evidence. My math checks out, yours does not.
>You can't even read a single room The irony...
>How do you look at this room and think "Admiration"?It's not so much admiration, but the distinct lack of a romantic or sexualised framing within the image. Reference is easy: we are literally looking up at Victor. Obsession qualifies by sheer quantity alone. Romance...what?
>Pretend you don't know the character's sex. Or pretend that's a girl.I don't need to pretend anything, since we are never shown anyone besides Victor in that image to begin with. Again, your going beyond the scope of what's shown to you in this one image. But I think this point has been made well enough for anyone else to grasp by now.
