>>2545494I am sorry, but what exactly did this post (
>>2545456) add to the discussion?
The fact that there is an inferior version of this work somewhere on the Internet?
There are helpful people here. The person who actually pays for these works and shares them for free is no doubt helpful.
I'd argue that anons making copies on trusted resources like E-H are helpful as well, as there is never enough backups for what is essentially a pirated content.
But this? What exactly is helpful in sharing a link to a website that only allows you to see scaled down, poorly compressed versions of the work? In my opinion, sharing nothing is better than sharing this.
