>>2546659>Still wondering who's the autist?>constructive criticism is "nitpickin"Want to know how I know you never worked with art?
>Also why would I spend a great deal of time making a real critique if the artist won't take any of the criticism that's given to him?Because you didn't, and until you do all you're doing is shitting up the thread and making everyone a lot more miserable. AFTER you did, if he doesn't, then you might have a point.
>you're right, it isn't. So why do you think I should give a proper critique here if you're so turned off by it?Because it's better than the endless waves of written diarrhea you're currently doing. Personally I'd much rather have you just shut up in general.
Yeah, you nitpicked my comments, literally.
Don't see how that's unclear. And you pretty much weren't anywhere on IC or previous versions of this thread when criticism was given to him, so you can't say it wasn't ever given to him. And well, you're the one continuing to reply to your autistic whiteknighting, when you pretty much clueless to the amounts of critiques given to the guy, simply don't reply.
And while I'm at it, the OP post image is colored, if you cant seen the lazy coloring, you're bllind. And criticism CAN contain subjective views from the critique, why do you think criticism varies from person to person? I'd go more in deph, but honestly I think that'd just trigger your autism even more.
