>>2421019That fucking watermark though. I thought it was a stock photo from shutterstocks or something. Also, fugly arts with sloppy lines shouldn't be needing watermarks at all. At least not THAT BIG. I can guarantee no one's gonna edit/copy/stole your shitty artworks. That's for damn sure. If you want to advertise your artwork (or at least traced artwork in this case), you don't want to distract viewers with some massive fugly ass watermark. That doesn't make the picture at all.
Everyone can create content but not everyone is an artist.
