>>2351435yoooo man if you're gonna try and bring up the actors' privacy and whether or not it matters calling people disgusting creeps as if they were aware of the complexities of the issue, deemed the effects of their actions harmful and still chose to do it really ain't where ya wanna start and probably isn't even true
>>2351438>implicitly confirming that you think something is wrong but "we're already doing it so why would be be concerned about stopping"this is a site you can't browse for very long without becoming concerned for some posters but this line of thinking is one of hardest things I've seen reclusive depressed people absorb. please try not to do this.
>>2351441it actually might have, if for no other reason than "eddy is a not unattractive boy and this is theater we're talking about" but I'd advise you not to fap to this. no matter what his or his potential extortioners' kinks, literally no-one in this situation would have found it hot. it just kinda "is what it is" to all of them and it seriously fucks up how they view their selves, careers, and relationships with others in the long term.
there are elements in this kind of story that make it arousing to many people in a fictional context, but this rumor is probably so close to not being fictional in most people's minds that they might actually similarly fuck themselves up fantasizing about it. there's lots of distinctly fictional porn out there if this is your kind of thing.
i don't wanna go all sjw up in here but please take care of yourselves.
