>>2985667I or anyone not retarded can instantly recognize stable-diffusion generated images. The machines might get better, but the images generated suck. They will take an artist touching them up to look halfway decent. Look at this trash. This poor boy has two nutsacks.
The fact is, some artists will use "AI" as a tool to help them produce better work faster. And others will cry and bitch. A bunch of twitter "artists" feel angry, threatened, and used every morning, and it's because they spend all day making a drawing only to sell it for $25, when rent costs $100 a day. We know they are mooching on someone else, and we don't respect them.
Sorry, we aren't gonna all stop progress so a handful of shitty twitter artists can keep drawing furry porn and make less than rent. Not that we could stop it if we wanted to.
Artists that can't draw, and over rely on tech aren't replacing anyone anytime soon.
