Mochizuki and the abc conjecture
No.14425767 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>14425882 >>14425931 >>14426182 >>14426460 >>14427420 >>14428008
> Publishes a supposed proof via a journal of which he's the chief editor
> Refuses to give talks about it
> Scholze and Stix say his proof has fundamental gaps and errors
> Claims they just don't understand it
Who's correct here?
> Refuses to give talks about it
> Scholze and Stix say his proof has fundamental gaps and errors
> Claims they just don't understand it
Who's correct here?
