/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #14424526

7KiB, 340x59, scientists.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Scientists

Anonymous Sun 24 Apr 16:45:39 2022 No.14424526 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14424541 >>14425394

Do most scientists agree or disagree?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Apr 2022 16:48:03 No.14424534 Report

Quoted By:

Editors are right. Citations needed. You are not writing a novel.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Apr 2022 16:50:03 No.14424541 Report

Quoted By:

>>14424526
Cool. Now do the one on climate change.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Apr 2022 22:29:48 No.14425394 Report

Quoted By: >>14425415

>>14424526
I wish every Wikipedia article was this based.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Apr 2022 22:34:22 No.14425415 Report

Quoted By: >>14425423 >>14425799 >>14426453

>>14425394
https://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page
Try this.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Apr 2022 22:37:39 No.14425423 Report

Quoted By: >>14425433

>>14425415
Fuck off retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Apr 2022 22:40:24 No.14425432 Report

Quoted By:

Link article.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Apr 2022 22:41:29 No.14425433 Report

Quoted By:

>>14425423
>Fuck off retard
^Not based

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Apr 2022 01:32:22 No.14425799 Report

Quoted By:

>>14425415
Delusional site

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Apr 2022 07:55:47 No.14426453 Report

Quoted By: >>14427177

>>14425415
Is this website a shitpost or do people unironically believe the stuff in it?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Apr 2022 14:43:54 No.14427177 Report

Quoted By:

>>14426453
>A black hole is a theoretical formation in space with near-infinite density and sufficient gravitational force that escape velocity exceeds the speed of light. Thus, "black" refers to the impossibility of any light (photons) escaping, thereby making them completely dark.[1] But reports of black holes may simply be a scientific form of fake news.
>Black holes are increasingly promoted by liberal publications, such as the science page of the New York Times, glossy magazines, and movies including Event Horizon (1997), The Black Hole (TV, 2006), and Interstellar (2014). Black holes fail the falsifiability requirement of science, because it is impossible to prove that they do not exist anywhere in the universe. Black holes have an everyday meaning, as in the New York Times referring to Justice David Souter's "chambers as a black hole, from which nothing emerges," a criticism the Times never voiced again once Souter moved to the pro-abortion side
>Because of quantum-mechanical phenomena involving Hawking Radiation, discussed later in the article, black holes must emit radiation and thus are not perfectly black. Nevertheless, they are called "black holes". Quibbling about this is similar to quibbling about the statement "The Earth is round".

Dare I say based?

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches