>>14420724>All yes men gagged with NDA contracts. She even sent a team of hard thugs to intimidate a whistleblower.So, that's the problem.... not the 'invention" itself...?
>What does this even mean?it means right now, we take a specific a amount of blood, divide it, prepare it, an then we click a button and the results to com out with suggestions through the EHR
depending on the nature of the substances to measured, multiple tests could be done on a single sample.
The size of the measurement devices have shrank drastically since the 50s, as the technologies themselves have changed.
>>14420741>CEOSA team is not comprised solely of CEOs, MAN!
>>14421414This thread wasn't about her or him or any person, its about the project... amore than 100 millions and nothing of value was produced, God dammit!
>>14421750>it was completely detached from the reality of how and why labs are doneAlmost every "new invention" gets targeted by people like you who have a pea for a brain, you can't see what's beyond the currant state so every thing to you is "far fetched, imaginary, impossible... etc" but guess what? We only people who invent stuff are remembered, never the short-sighted naggers or shallow critics.
>Women can't lead, produce or do anything significantI agree
>She was a fraud and she should payI agree
Guys, plz! keep it about the idea...
I spent a plenty of time on idea similar to hers (halted it indefinitely) and I could see that it's possible and if she wasn't a fraud, the company might have done something by now.
