>>14421916oh yeah, i kinda forgot about that. another illness semi-cured in rats or mice with no analogue in humans.
but still i don't think he's getting too much out of it, and in the worst case scenario he's analyzing biochemical pathways, which is kinda legit on its own due to its potential complexity. i still don't think he's that much of a grifter, i mean he has a book and that's kinda it, a real grifter seeks and gets constant media attention, founds one firm after another, shills his shit on governmental levels for absurd amounts of funding then uses the wealth of his company to liquidate stocks and so on.
so even if he's wrong on what he does, there is at least SOME scientific work being done, and we don't know if anything can build on what he and his team did. could be mundane stuff, could be more.
idk. i'm pretty indifferent about the guy. but i could also be misinformed and he made a fortune selling his books or whatever. i wouldn't buy it.