>hits blunt
Alright, so hear me out.
Why are all of these math motherfuckers ignoring that 3x+1 does not work the same on negative numbers? In everything I’ve read, these assholes say that -5 and -17 loops, when in fact it’s an entirely different equation.
In negative land, 3x+1 is really subtracting from the real number. So it would be like saying 3x-1 is the same equation.
If we use the number 5 as an example
5x3+1=16
16/2=8
8/2=4
4/2=2
2/2=1
Or
-5x3+1=-14
-14/2=-7
-7x3+1=-20
-20/2=-10
-10/2=-5
It’s totally fucking different.
-5x3-1=-16
-16/2=-8
-8/2=-4
-4/2=-2
-2/2=-1
This makes way more sense and knocks out the notion that there may be other loops. 4,2,1 is the only loop. (Fuck zero, doesn’t count)
Alright, so hear me out.
Why are all of these math motherfuckers ignoring that 3x+1 does not work the same on negative numbers? In everything I’ve read, these assholes say that -5 and -17 loops, when in fact it’s an entirely different equation.
In negative land, 3x+1 is really subtracting from the real number. So it would be like saying 3x-1 is the same equation.
If we use the number 5 as an example
5x3+1=16
16/2=8
8/2=4
4/2=2
2/2=1
Or
-5x3+1=-14
-14/2=-7
-7x3+1=-20
-20/2=-10
-10/2=-5
It’s totally fucking different.
-5x3-1=-16
-16/2=-8
-8/2=-4
-4/2=-2
-2/2=-1
This makes way more sense and knocks out the notion that there may be other loops. 4,2,1 is the only loop. (Fuck zero, doesn’t count)