>>14413535Well, no it isn't rigorous. Even if "c > aleph_0" was proven here, it is not the same as "no c exists between aleph_0 and aleph_1".
> I'm going to try the list of unsolved Mathematics problems on wikipedia to learn the university curriculum on the wayI do recommend this as a learning tool, but don't expect to solve much. Not to be discouraging, but these are major problems for a reason. More specific questions may get you better answers.
