>>14402956>There's no such thing as imaginary numbers.I'd be happy to prove you wrong, but first you need to explain what you mean.
The concept of imaginary numbers certainly exists, so there's existence in that sense. Alternatively we can define imaginary numbers and make sense of propositions that assert the existence of certain individual imaginary numbers or of the set of all imaginary numbers (given a particular encoding) and given some assumptions we can even show those propositions to be true, so we have existence in the sense that it's usually used in mathematics. Being charitable to your argument, let's assume that you mean to deny that imaginary numbers exist in some other sense.
What is the sense of existence that you deny imaginary numbers have? Please be specific, because we can't respond to your claim until you explain what it is.
