>>14402644I actually said the exact opposite of that.
We should simply promote most talented individuals and judge them solely for the accomplishments. One group might have more talented individuals than the others but it doesn't really change anything.
If you took, say, 10,000 of smartest people the majority of them (probably the overwhelming majority but I'm too lazy to do the math) would probably be male like
>>14400662 explained. They would still be the 10,000 smartest people and roughly equal intellectually even if there are statistical differences on the group level.
You all are no better than all those ultra-woke types making everything about identity politics.
And it's largely because of people like you, sperging about "the truth" or "women being intellectually inferior", that we are stuck with gender/race quotas and related bullshit.
Because you are literally participating in the ""oppression"" they're blaming for their shortcomings. Treat them as you treat everyone else and they'll no longer be able to benefit from their "discriminated against" status, simple as that.
