>>14374796Your reasoning is horribly faulty and the exact kind of thing I'm talking about. Death is not a thing, it's not a state "you" can be in. Death is merely absence. I'm going to throw you a bone and hope you can at least refine your shitty cope if you read a decent (if somewhat schizo) philosophy paper that touches on this.
http://naturalism.org/philosophy/death/death-nothingness-and-subjectivity> So when I recommend that you look forward to the (continuing) sense of always having been here, construe that "you" not as a particular person, but as that condition of awareness, which although manifesting itself in finite subjectivities, nevertheless always finds itself present.>To identify ourselves with generic subjectivity is perhaps as far as the naturalistic materialist can go towards accepting some sort of immortality. It isn't conventional immortality (not even as good as living in others' memory, some might think), since there is no "one" who survives, just the persistence of subjectivity for itselfTl;dr but it's not like you'll get it anyway, even if a kind of generic subjectivity that is always present to itself, it is not you in any meaningful sense. When you're dead you're dead, better start making good use of your time.
