Fermi paradox/Great filter

No.14373976 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Is evolution itself, I'm unable to visualize a life form that would improve it's environment (Industrial revolution) while subsequently ensuring undesirable offspring are culled from existence. animals with low genetic load may not even be able to evolve sentience, but the fact that genetic mutations are FAR FAR FAR more likely to be disadvantageous to somethings survival is a rule that's shared by ALLLLLL life on earth.

Eugenics/gene mutation wouldn't work, nothing is perfect an when children have unforeseen genetic mutations would we be willing to kill them? Would any intelligent life form be willing to kill it's offspring?

>Humanities IQ is falling and every disorder is on the rise be it physical/mental(Fuck off yes I also understand pharmaceutical companies will pull any bullshit out of their ass so they can prescribe you the next ''Be happy fry your brain'' drug)
>1800=40/50% Child mortality, 2022=1% (Child mortality is children dying ages 0-5)
>Pic is our future.

I'd also like to add that I'm a dysgenic retard, I had asthma when I was younger. If this was 1800 I would have died as a child ensuring I don't pass on my genes.