Debunking Prepetual Motion

No.14373762 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Hello

I have a question regarding perpetual motion . I have tried to debunk it but I cant seem to find anything wrong with the concept. I think i am missing something so please help.

There is a solid suspended on top of an insulated container full of liquid. It's density would cause it to sink. However, some of kinetic energy from the solid falling is converted into heat energy. This heat energy is enough to raise the temperature of the solid to a point where it's density will decrease to the point where it starts floating. When the solid is at the top, energy is slowly released from the system, and the process repeats.

Wouldn't this system generate far more work then the potential energy that was put into it?

00011010 00110010 00100011 11011001 10011110 10001110 01011111 11101110 10111011 10000011 00111001 11011000 01100110 00100000 11110101