I have spoken to numerous "PhD"s and found at least 90% of them are beyond fraudulent.
You question their proof and they resort to citing literature (not the data, just X said Y).
You ask them to explain mechanistically how their result could be explained. 99% CANNOT provide a novel explanation for their observationd
If you hear someone declare they are a scientist, I IMPLORE you to kill them immediately.
We are in a death spiral in which actual scientists cannot discuss their observations due to dilution of the profession by retards.
I will probably be erased due to this post & 4chan does not allow file sizes required to transmit proof.
You question their proof and they resort to citing literature (not the data, just X said Y).
You ask them to explain mechanistically how their result could be explained. 99% CANNOT provide a novel explanation for their observationd
If you hear someone declare they are a scientist, I IMPLORE you to kill them immediately.
We are in a death spiral in which actual scientists cannot discuss their observations due to dilution of the profession by retards.
I will probably be erased due to this post & 4chan does not allow file sizes required to transmit proof.
