/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #14371670

6KiB, 250x234, 1649177976722s.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Thu 07 Apr 11:34:38 2022 No.14371670 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14371811 >>14371929 >>14371943 >>14373905 >>14373923

>research implies that if you go faster than light you can go back in time
>Research also implies that you can't go faster than light

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Apr 2022 12:37:22 No.14371811 Report

Quoted By:

>>14371670
I don't see the problem here

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Apr 2022 12:45:44 No.14371831 Report

Quoted By: >>14373923

It’s easily possible to go faster than light according to my research. Light is made of photons and photons have no mass. So to go faster than light you need negative mass, aka antimatter. Imagine a hypothetical ship which is contained inside a magnetic field of normal matter surrounded by antimatter. The antimatter can be accelerated to a super-light speed upon which the field can be dissolved and the ship can emerge into normal matter in a new space time.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Apr 2022 13:28:03 No.14371929 Report

Quoted By:

>>14371670
If connect a wormhole next to a black hole, time by the black hole will be going slower than time connected in some other region of space. So that if you travel through it from the others side you will have went back in time as the clock was ticking slower there.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Apr 2022 13:32:29 No.14371943 Report

Quoted By: >>14371947

>>14371670
science is always proven wrong in the end.
Newton? Einstein? itheir work is starting to fall apart now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Apr 2022 13:34:27 No.14371947 Report

Quoted By: >>14372085

>>14371943
Newton's work fell apart long ago, Einstein's not at all, even a hundred years later and there's still new evidences that prove GR correct

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Apr 2022 14:27:18 No.14372085 Report

Quoted By:

>>14371947
>black holes

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Apr 2022 02:29:15 No.14373905 Report

Quoted By:

>>14371670
Wait if humans have latency in their processing of stimuli to perception, how did we arrive at the conclusion that the speed of light is what it is? Aren't our observations lagging behind with blanks being filled by our brain's speculation?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Apr 2022 02:32:32 No.14373923 Report

Quoted By: >>14373942

>>14371831
antimatter doesn’t have negative mass

>>14371670
you’re talking about two different kinds of
>research
the first is theoretical math, the second is observation based and experimentally confirmed

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Apr 2022 02:35:10 No.14373942 Report

Quoted By: >>14375015

>>14373923
>observation
>experiment
>confirmed
cringe

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Apr 2022 02:38:48 No.14373961 Report

Quoted By:

the terminal velocity of light is the speed of light cubed plus the cube route of the speed. So if you travel at the speed of light, you're just going fast. There is no time, only distance.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Apr 2022 07:05:21 No.14374637 Report

Quoted By:

not so much time travel, but FTL is a problem for Ai to solve in next decade,

i wouldnt even give it a second thought in this decade.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO soyence bingo.png, 32KiB, 694x968

Anonymous Fri 08 Apr 2022 07:39:28 No.14374693 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Apr 2022 10:57:19 No.14375015 Report

Quoted By:

>>14373942
what is so cringe? thats literally how experimental science works

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches