>>14371261No, it's not about grievances, it's about the ACoE pointing out that Elon seems to be saying that Florida is a viable alternative. If it is, it would likely also be one for the environmental review as the criteria are similar (and the permit being reviewed by the ACoE is for a lot of the construction proposed in the proposal that is under environmental review), which would make approval for that harder.
It's an "if this is an issue in this process, it's likely to also be an issue in this other process" situation.
>>14371574I can't tell if you're serious, but if you are, Super Heavy has three times the liftoff thrust of Falcon Heavy. Those 4 more engines (33 - 27 = 6 btw) produce more thrust than one Falcon 9.
>>14371803I think ESGHound underestimates Elon's capacity for squeaking through holes noone else can even see, but unfavourable indications are piling up a bit. It's conceivable the reason SpaceX haven't supplied the information to the Army Corps of Engineers is specifically that the permit review is linked closely with the PEA so they won't submit until they've finished hashing out the details with the FAA and found a justification for not having KSC as a No Action Alternative, but who knows.
