>>14367343>1 - Why are "superior" people being out-bred by "inferior" people? Genetic fitness is defined exactly as passing your genes along.Just because 80 iq criminal gets to have more kids than 120 iq engineer and he is more genetically fit doesn't mean we shouldn't put a stop to it.
>2 - State clearly, right now, your list of criteria for deciding who gets to live and who is culled/prevented from reproducing.That's the tough question, but sometimes you see a person and you just know.
Go online and look up some torture and gore videos, that's an example of people that should be destroyed and have no business being alive.
People with an IQ below 85 shouldn't exist.
I am not saying only 145 iq autists should exist, but there's way too much dead weight on the other end.
Also it's not about culling or castrating people, but about changing the culture so that we prevent "inferior" (as you called them) people from breeding too much.
A eugenics strategy doesn't have to work overnight in one or two generations, but we need to always be going in the right direction, virtue-wise.
Currently we are headed the wrong way.
>3 - Prove that evolution and natural selection is good/intelligent, and not just a random thing nature does. Why is nature's genetic algorithm necessarily the best solution to the deeper problems of reality?Because if humans were better organized and more intelligent we would be able to acquire more knowledge and we would be closer to understanding the world around us.
Also we would live happier and more meaningful lives.
>>14367356Sexual selection is a thing, that's why humanity is getting dumber by the day.
